I will compare each software with JPEG quality set to 100% and then 70%. I wanted to do my own test.įor this test, I compressed images with each of the following: JPEGmini, Squash, and ImageOptim. Other commenters suggest that using the image quality slider in Adobe Lightroom would be just as effective. One other person agreed with me and indicated that he got good results with the FREE ImageOptim app for macOS. To me the comparison was unfair and I took issue with this on MacWorld’s Facebook page. I am not sure why the author chose to compare Squash to the JPEGmini Pro when JPEGmini is available for $20. The article was a cursory review and comparison of Realmac’s Squash ($20) to JPEGmini Pro. A recently article in MacWorld promote me to take a look at alternatives. While JPEGmini Pro has worked well for me I have never done a comparison test with other software. The plug-in can be integrated with any of Adobe® Lightroom’s export presets. When I export my photos directly from Lightroom or Photoshop, they are automatically optimized by JPEGmini to the lowest file size possible without ever sacrificing quality. JPEGmini Pro includes a plug-in for Adobe® Lightroom® and a Photoshop® extension! I have used it successfully with the Creative Cloud version of Lightroom and Photoshop. The software reduces the file size of my photos significantly, saving me space on a server and speeding up my website. I have used JPEGmini Pro for a few years as part of my workflow for posting images to my WordPress website. JPEGmini is available for Windows and macOS with support for Adobe Lightroom 5 and later Photoshop: CC 2015.1 and later. The software is available in two consumer versions, JPEGmini ($20) and JPEGmini Pro ($99). JPEGmini is a photo optimization technology that reduces the file size of JPEG photos while preserving the resolution and quality of the original photos. Ideally, I would be able to display my images at a decent size while also reduce the size of the images. I think it's hard to see detail when the images are too small. However, I feel that small images sizes just don't work well for many of my images. I could reduce the file size further by uploading smaller images - e.g. While this reduces the file size considerably, it may not be enough. For this reason, I always downsize my images to between 960 pixels to 1024 pixels on the long side. This will be frustrating to my websites viewers. Loading a full-size image also impact the performance of the website. Uploading a full resolution image to my website would use considerable bandwidth and space on my server. While file size varies most files are between 3.5 MB to 5 MB. While my Nikon D5100 camera only a 16MP sensor, the size of the images it produces can be quite large.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |